People of Color


Thirty-nine percent of LGBTQ adults identify as people of color, including 15 percent who identify as Latinx, 11 percent as Black, two percent as Asian Pacific Islander, and one percent as Native American. This is more diverse than the overall U.S. adult population, which is 65 percent white. The higher representation of people of color in LGBTQ communities is in part related to age. With increasing acceptance of LGBTQ people, younger generations are more likely to be out as LGBTQ. Younger people are also more likely to be of color, which is the main reason that a large proportion of people of color identify as LGBTQ. From service provision to movement building, there is a need to respond and adapt to a new generation in the U.S. that is more diverse than any previous generation in terms of race, sexual orientation, and gender identity.

At the intersection of two marginalized identities, LGBTQ people of color often face stark disparities:

In recent years, a number of funders have collaborated on efforts to address the unique needs of men and boys of color. As with men and boys of color, the disparities faced by LGBTQ communities of color can be seen as a “canary in the coalmine”—an indicator of more widespread problems in a variety of systems. If funders can identify interventions that improve outcomes for the most vulnerable populations, such as LGBTQ communities of color, that will lead to system-wide change that will improve outcomes for all communities.

For more information on the unique needs and challenges faced by LGBTQ communities of color, we recommend these resources:

In 2014, foundations awarded nearly $19 million focused on LGBTQ communities of color in the United States. This is a slight decrease from 2013, when about $20 million was focused on LGBTQ communities of color.

More than $11 million—60 percent of funding for LGBTQ communities of color—was devoted to organizations and projects serving LGBTQ communities of color broadly. The remaining $8 million was devoted to work specifically focused on Asian American/Pacific Islander, Black, Latinx communities, Middle Eastern, and Native American communities.


LGBTQ Funding for Communities of Color, by Racial/Ethnic Group (2014)

Looking at funding for LGBTQ communities of color by issue addressed, the largest amounts were devoted to civil rights ($7.7 million) and health ($6.6 million). About $2.5 million was devoted to communities, families, and visibility, and about $1 million was devoted to economic issues such as housing and employment. No other issue category garnered more than $1 million.


LGBTQ Funding for People of Color, by Issue Addressed (2014)


In recent years, Funders for LGBTQ Issues has released infographics on funding for LGBTQ Asian/Pacific Islander communities and on funding for GBTQ men and boys of color, and plans to release additional infographics on other LGBTQ populations of color in the years to come.

In 2014, the top 10 funders for LGBTQ communities of color in the U.S. awarded about $11.9 million, or about 60 percent of the total. Most of these top funders were also top funders of LGBTQ issues generally or of HIV/AIDS prevention and treatment. Six of the top ten funders were located in New York City.

Top Ten Funders for LGBTQ Communities of Color (2014)

1.     Arcus Foundation — New York, NY $3,171,050
2.     Gilead Sciences — Foster City, CA $2,017,076
3.     Ford Foundation — New York, NY $1,600,000
4.     Elton John AIDS Foundation — New York, NY $1,365,000
5.     Anonymous Funders — Various Locations $900,000
6.     Astraea Lesbian Foundation for Justice — New York, NY $730,809
7.     Gill Foundation — Denver, CO $710,000
8.     Kaiser Permanente — Oakland, CA $513,000
9.     Foundation for a Just Society — New York, NY $460,000
10.  Henry van Ameringen Foundation — New York, NY $445,000

In 2014, the top ten grant recipients of funding for LGBTQ communities of color received a total of nearly $4.9 million, or about one-quarter of funding that year. Four of the top ten recipients were located in New York.

Top Ten Grant Recipients of Funding for LGBTQ Communities of Color (2014)

1.     Southerners on New Ground (SONG) — Atlanta, GA $806,000
2.     Ali Forney Center — New York, NY $599,067
3.     Forward Together — Oakland, CA $586,030
4.     Sylvia Rivera Law Project (SRLP) — New York, NY $567,000
5.     Streetwise and Safe (SAS) — New York, NY $524,000
6.     Freedom To Marry — New York, NY $375,000
7.     United We Dream Network — Washington, DC $362,500
8.     National Black Justice Coalition (NBJC) — Washington, DC $356,215
9.     Kaiser Family Foundation — Menlo Park, CA $350,000
10.  Racial Justice Action Center (RJAC) — Atlanta, GA $335,000

For funders seeking to support work at the intersection of racial equity and LGBTQ rights, there are a number of community assets to build on:

Building on these assets, funders have several opportunities to advance racial equity and LGBTQ rights:

  • Build capacity of groups rooted in LGBT communities of color: There are dozens of organizations doing important intersectional work rooted in LGBTQ communities of color, but most are under-resourced or highly dependent on restricted government grants for HIV and health services. Funders have an opportunity to build the capacity of these grassroots groups to build out their staffing, fundraising, advocacy, and communications.
  • Support LGBTQ leaders of color: LGBTQ leaders of color are already having a visible and powerful impact in a range of movements. Funders have an opportunity to support these leaders, both through direct investment in their work and through leadership development programs.
  • Support intersectional organizing and alliances for racial justice and LGBTQ rights: A growing number of organizations and coalitions are advocating for both racial justice and LGBTQ rights in integrated, intersectional ways. Funders have an opportunity to assure that these efforts are fully resourced and sustained so as to foster meaningful long-term change on issues ranging from nondiscrimination protections to policing reform.